Friday, September 7, 2012

Who am I?

That's the question I keep thinking recently, about myself and other people in my life.

Who am I? What defines me? 

By the things that I like? But my preference changes all the time! "... People can change. Today he likes pineapple, tomorrow he can like other food..." (Chungking Express)

By my disposition? But I have mood swing frequently. Sometimes I can explain it (because of things I do or people I encounter) but most of the time I don't know why I feel the way I feel. So I could be sunshine when I'm in euphoria or sour and gloomy when I'm depressed (which I usually choose to hide). So am I defined by what I try to project in front of people?

By my action? 

But we all know the little Angle and little Demon that float around our heads when we face a dilemma. Sometimes the Angle wins, other time the demon wins. Am I defined by my Angle or my Demon? Or how often I listen to the Angle? Maybe this statistic tells part of my character too.

And so many things can alter our behavior! Alcohol for example. It makes people act differently. It makes some cry or laugh hysterically. It makes some talk, talk to person/about things/in ways they wouldn't dare to otherwise. Call our ex maybe? Some may secretly admit those are the true emotion/feelings/opinion that bury deep in their hearts but wouldn't dare to unleash when sober. Some may still claim that's totally "not me!" and don't know where the other side comes from. If that's the case, which one is the real me? Should I be defined by the worst or the best of me?

Maybe it's not a good example since we can clearly identify the cause and distinguish the before and after. What if we can see the cause or even don't realize there's something causing the change of behavior? 

In one interesting episode of Science Friday a neuroscientist, David Eagleman, talks about his book, Incognito: The Secret Lives of the Brain, and his research.

One of his experiments is worth mentioning. The setting is very simple, if the subjects hit a button a light would turn on. If there's a small delay, say 1/10 of a second, people usually wouldn't notice the lag and can still link the cause and reaction. But if, after a few runs with the lag, this delay is removed, people would think the light was switched on BEFORE they hit the button and therefore they was not the one who turn it on. This simple illusion about time and timing resembles remarkably what Schizophrenia patients experience, after they've done something they would claim they're not the one who is responsible since it has happened before they do anything. The mis-perception of time/timing could fundamentally change our interpretation of the world. And our perception of the exterior in turn would change our internal voice which guides us in decision making.

Eagleman also talks about the shooting rampage at Austin Texas in 1966. The "manic" Charles Whitman killed his wife, his mother, and 16 other random people. But the thing is he was not like that! He sensed his change of temper one year before and started documented his feeling and tried to seek medical help. He was even insightful enough to demand autopsy in his suicide note. They later found out he had a tumor pressing part of the brain involved in fear and aggression.

So in the end what makes us who we are indeed???

Until next time, love and peace!

Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Why does it always rain on me?

The London Olympic this year reminds me of a story I heard in an episode of This American Life. Kaiser Kuo (郭怡广) is a Chinese American and former guitarist and founding member in one of the most influential Chinese rock bands, Tang Dynasty. His parents are Chinese. Although he was born in the US he moved back to China with his parents when he was a kid and lives there ever since. After the US bombing incident (of the Chinese embassy in Yugoslavia) Kuo was invited to perform in a supposedly peace concert. But it turned out to be a political rally protesting against the bombing, the country that released the bombs, and its people. Kuo was put on the spot and he was questioned by thousands of strangers in the rally and, most important of all, his band mates! Noted the band was formed in 1988 so they've known each other for over ten years then. That is when he realized he is a foreigner after all. By the way he left the band afterward. (The fun fact for me is that he has absolutely nothing to do with the bombing!)

I remembered the incident when it happened. The news media went crazy over it, when it's not covering the event it's reporting the protests from all over China. The US claimed it's a terrible accident and China, at least its people, didn't seem to buy that. When national matters happen I notice the authority suddenly would not be so strict about rallying and protesting, in fact they encourage it. When one doesn't act patriotically in crisis like this one is very likely to be accused of being a traitor! That was when the internet was yet to enter ordinary household. I imagine nowadays any opposite comments dare to show up in any forum one should prepare to be dawned by thousands if not millions of replies (mixed with fair amount of personal attacks).

Back to the Olympic game, the reason I think of the bombing incident is because my fellow citizens feel "bombed" again by the western world for all the unfair ruling to our athletes. On top of everything even the scientists do not side with us! I got couple emails from Chinese Students and Scholar Association in my school informing me, we are ready to launch a protest against Nature!

As in all other national crises I should not take side and I would not! My ONLY point in this article is: man, the comment from Lai Jiang is hell of a perfect GRE argument!! I mean it from the bottom of my heart!!

Until next time, LOVE & PEACE :D

Thursday, August 2, 2012

Long Shots

It has been a long long time since I last updated this blog, partly because I was otherwise engaged, but more importantly is because I have doubt about a lot of things. That is until I heard an episode of This American Life called Long Shots. The general theme for the episode is keep trying even when the odds are against them.

One of the stories is particularly heartfelt for me. It's about a man who was sentenced to life with parole after inadvertently killed another man in an armed robbery in his twenties. He served his time as a model prisoner -- took courses and got associate degree, followed all the rules and not got into fights -- for 20+ years. Then  he appealed for parole for 6 times even though he knows his chances is so slim just because he is in California. CA, among MD and OK, are the only three states where the governors can over-rule release decisions made by parole board, mainly out of political reasons. I can see the obvious reason for that. They had committed gruesome crime in the past, releasing them could be like releasing a ticking bomb. No governors want to be responsible for the next crimes they may or may not commit. But on the other hand, we all make mistakes. True, theirs are way more severe and irreversible, but after they have paid the most valuable things one can give, other than life, their youth and all the happiness they could have had, and are truly repent, shouldn't they deserve a second chance? It's hard enough to convince a group of experts in the parole board to believe they have changed, but once they managed to do that, why can some politicians revoke the freedom they fought so hard just to please voters who don't know what they have been through, what have changed over time, what went through their mind? I can't imagine how it feels to long for something so bad, try so hard to secure it, but knowing the probability need to constantly remind oneself to be realistic, yet couldn't help but see signs and be hopeful, but only to have it taken away at the very last minute! If I knew all these would I ever bother trying in the first place?

Okay you know I'm not talking about the case any more. It's dilemma we all face sometime in life. For me, it's about career change which probably isn't such a long shot comparing to the poor man, but knowing myself for all these years and my own track records, I have nothing about doubt. I was never good at writing and probably will never be. A lot of the times my thoughts and feelings are like spinning dryer, tumbling inside but I can't get them out, in words. And yet recently I did fall for writing. Is it worth trying even if I know I am not good at it, or worse, will never be good at it? What can I offer? What makes me or my opinion unique? There are too many questions I don't know. But still I'm putting all these here. Alas I guess if something is beautiful enough, then I wouldn't be at ease if I don't try, against all odds, Nothing Else Matters...

Until next time, love and peace!


Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Birds of feather flock together

Since I said "daily" exploration in the last post, I feel the pressure to keep updating at least every other day, alas~~ so I decided to change it to "weekly" discoveries ;P

The most interesting thing I saw today is a fleet of at least 8 bikes on 295 in Washington direction. They are maybe riding to some function since I noticed the couple on one motorcycle besides me when I'm merging were wearing matching T-shirts, which I thought was so cute that I gave them a thumb up, plus all bikes are spotless and look very similar in style and color. Oh, how I wish I could take a picture of them!


The next interesting thing is a podcast I started listening yesterday about how using (or disregarding) our herd mentality would affect the efficacy of public policies which I thought was the best episode of Freakonomics I heard lately. Since I'm writing during work hour, I would resume later today, until then, love and peace!


[Later today] So as you may have learned by now how mimes are better in keeping the traffic in Bogota under control than police, or how by setting up warning signs people, maybe the most righteous people mind you, are more tempted to violate those rules, or how our neighbors are the real determining factor in our energy conservation, or how far people would go to break the rule just to keep their lawns lust and green. No? Then click the link in the last paragraph and listen to the podcast! The podcast also mentioned a book called Influence which should be a good read! In the mean time I probably would try to shame my roommate to clean our apartment more often, mwahahaha... 


Until next time, love and peace!

Monday, July 9, 2012

No better day to start something new and exciting like TODAY

Although this is not the first time I keep a public blog, the thought of starting something new, especially a scientific blog, is still super exciting, maybe a bit nervous. That said, I should start documenting my daily discoveries right NOW!

It's been a while since I last checked out Science Friday, so when I refreshed my iTune video podcast today I saw two very cool clips.

One is a rap song about what Large Hadron Collider does. Even though it does a very good job in explaining some complicated terms and concepts in limited words and keeps them cool, fun, and rhymes at the same time, I still couldn't claim I understand fully or at least enough to rephrase what have been said. So I'll let you be the judge or you may simply enjoy the music and their goofy geeky dance ;P



The second one is an animation called what is flame. Since it's a longer video and a relatively simpler (but equally interesting) phenomenon, I felt I truly grasp how flame works at the end (now that I think about it, maybe I SHOULD have known all these ages ago??? Oh well... never too late to learn). The video started out by noting what we can see and feel about fire: the colors, blue-ish, red-ish, orange-ish, and yellow-ish from the core to the outer layer, and the heat. It went on to present the three components of any fire, H, C, and O, with the first two stack neatly like brick wall and the last ingredient floating in the atmosphere (Oh did I mention they use lego to illustrate all these atoms? Smart, right?). The first layer is the blue light when fuel turns into flame. The atoms rearrange and produce CO2 and H2O. The interesting and counter intuitive part is that the blue light itself is not hot but the flame is, and that is because the newly formed compounds are still very active and they can shake anything nearby, like the atoms of your fingertip which gives you the sensation of burning. The other colors in a flame are the results of burning when there's not enough O. The products are extra C. They together form a thing called soot which suck up heat and glow brighter and brighter. I know, I know, what I've just said would put you to sleep! What makes this video interesting is their use of animation, cartoon analogies, and funny sound and visual effects. You can check it out yourself:



Well, it's late, I should resume shortly when I see/learn anything new and interesting, until then, love and peace :D